• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

That's a trillion instances heavier than all of humanity. You could possibly repeat this thousands of times over the course of millions of years. It all relies upon how fussy you're about how the Earth seems to be afterwards, of course. Suppose that there have been ten billion people (another overestimate - there are about 6.Four billion at the time of writing). The most obvious main downside with this method is that right now there aren't even theories as to how you can presumably build rocket engines of the type proposed right here. The major drawback here is figuring out how to choose up huge pieces of continental plate without breaking them. The principle right here is much the identical, with the railguns behaving somewhat like discretized variations of thrusters, providing instantaneous changes in velocity versus sustained regular change. Atmospheric issues are ignored right here since it is much more vitality-environment friendly to manually take away the Earth's atmosphere, move the planet, and reinstall it. Wait long sufficient, and the photo voltaic wind blowing the sail outwards will take the Earth outward too, what is billiards since the 2 are gravitationally bound together!

And lastly, suppose that all of them jumped at precisely the identical instant, which in fact they will not, seeing as the time difference between the quickest watch and the slowest will possible be over 5 minutes. Note that the Earth doesn't and won't behave like a strong, inflexible billiard ball underneath such huge impacts as these. Suppose all people on the planet weighed 100kg (which is an overestimate, 70kg is extra prefer it, probably less). Ceres, the solar system's largest asteroid, has less than 1/40,000th the mass of Earth; the Moon, a mere 1/80th. These objects are the heaviest you are likely to find - there are heavier moons and entire planets you would consider using, but to be trustworthy from this viewpoint it looks extra like using a succession of hundreds, hundreds or tens of 1000's of smaller asteroid impacts could be a better guess. If there was some option to electrically charge the Earth, by dumping a lot of identically charged particles onto the Earth or just ionizing particles already on Earth - a large amber rod might maybe be so as - then we might use magnetic fields to drive the planet in the course we wished it to go.

Better, you may use many, many asteroids one after the other in a steady stream, and minimize down the full time significantly. It is possible to make use of a solar sail to steer the Earth into the Sun. Construct a huge solar sail with a significant mass. Direct matter propulsion. Same methodology as above, simply utilizing gigantic mass drivers/railguns to fireplace large portions of matter away from Earth, instead of a rocket exhaust. Billiards method. Clonk the Earth with something large and heavy, inflicting it to change course. Let me emphasize the words "huge", "heavy" and "clonk". Maybe Earth is about to hit an asteroid. You might reuse the same asteroid again and again, looping it around a number of gasoline giants and back to achieve tons more kinetic energy from those gas giants in the identical way that Earth simply gained velocity from the rock. It gets better. Even assuming the Earth did move by some significant distance when everyone jumped, just give it some thought: it'd transfer proper back again! Maybe you need to destroy it: a significant number of strategies for destroying the Earth contain transferring it by some substantial amount. Alternatively, as the Earth's angular kinetic power is negligible in comparison with its orbital kinetic power, you might consider diverting a comparatively small amount of sources to simply stopping the Earth from spinning in any respect, earlier than starting the main project.

Moving the Sun is about 6 orders of magnitude harder than shifting the Earth however the Sun is repeatedly emitting vitality which may be productively harnessed for this goal. This structure wouldn't be in orbit around the Sun, but static, remaining aloft utilizing the radiation strain of catching and reflecting photo voltaic energy. With half of the Sun's radiation blocked/reflected in the alternative course, the Sun now has a internet thrust upwards (i.e. in the path of the "hat"). Rather than simply bouncing off, the item destroyed much of each itself and Earth, inflicting a vast spray of matter to be hurled off from the impact point; this matter coagulated into what's now the Moon. Suppose that they all jumped ten metres within the air (an enormous overestimate, fifty centimetres is more likely and doubtless much less). This may be employed to maneuver the Sun and Earth in tandem to a place the place the Earth can more simply be destroyed. Direct rocket propulsion. Build gigantic, possibly nuclear upward-pointing rocket furnaces, perhaps one, possibly four, possibly a million, whatever you'll be able to price range for. Build an unlimited lightweight "hat" for the Sun, which catches the Sun's rays.