• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

A quote that comes back within a day counts as a red flag rather than good service. A competent team will come back with clarifying questions before any number: about integrations. A provider that commits to a figure before understanding the scope is simply pricing a guess, and the gap becomes a change request later — at your expense.

Look out for any distance between the people you meet and those who eventually appear in the repository. Request specific people rather than roles in the agreement, with a provision about substitutions. A vendor that talks only about a pool of resources and refuses to name individuals is reserving the right to assign anyone it likes.

Ask for the source repository from the first week. A provider that hands over code only at milestones expects you to trust a black box. Visible commits tell you the actual pace far better than a slide deck. This extends to the automated test suite: custom java development if nothing runs automatically, hire experienced node.js programmer assurances about quality remain nothing more than words.

Loose phrasing around intellectual property is never a formality. The contract needs to state in plain terms that all outputs produced under it become the property of your business on payment. Check also the governing law and the payment schedule: nodejs development company heavy prepayment with no deliverable attached takes away your only leverage.

Lastly, pay attention to how they communicate. Ask how much working-time overlap there will be each day, which named person answers your questions and on what response times. Four hours of overlap is usually enough; zero overlap turns a five-minute question into a lost day. Sloppy written English in the sales phase does not improve later.