• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Begin with domain experience, not the length of the client list. Ask to see a couple of engagements that match your stack, and then find out whether those engineers are still with the company. An honest provider will introduce you to the engineers. Evasive answers at this stage almost always mean you are talking to a reseller.

The contract needs more attention than the sales deck. A few clauses carry most of the weight: assignment of intellectual property, confidentiality, and vue.js vs react termination and handover. All the work product has to transfer to you once invoices are settled, along with designs, difference between symfony and spring boot scripts and infrastructure configuration. Be careful with language that keeps framework code in the vendor's hands, since this is frequently the dependency that makes switching painful.

Ask how they estimate. A credible estimate comes with a list of assumptions, a breakdown per feature and an explicit range. A fixed-bid deal is only reasonable when the specification is complete; in any other case the provider adds a risk premium and you fund the buffer regardless. Hourly billing puts the risk on your side, so it needs visible weekly reporting and a spending cap.

Process beats headcount. Establish how a new requirement enters the plan, who defines done and golang web development services how quality assurance works. A mature team should be able to walk you through running software rather than status reports. Clear, written acceptance criteria remain the practical protection against an argument at delivery time and materials vs fixed price.

Before signing, think about the end of the engagement at the start rather than at the end. Ask that the source repository stays on infrastructure you own from day one, and that documentation is updated as part of the work. A provider confident in its own work accepts it without argument; resistance at this point says most of what you need to know.