• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Look first at relevant experience, not the size of the portfolio. Request a couple of engagements that resemble your technology stack, saudi arabia software development agency and then ask who actually wrote that code. A serious vendor will put you on a call with the engineers. Vague answers at this stage almost always mean the demo work came from somewhere else.

The contract needs more scrutiny than the proposal. Three clauses do most of the work: offshore software development company assignment of intellectual property, the NDA, and exit terms and handover. All the work product must transfer to you on payment, along with source code, designs and infrastructure as code. Be careful with wording that keeps so-called reusable libraries outside the transfer, as that is often the part you cannot replace later.

Find out how the estimate was built. An honest estimate is accompanied by a written set of assumptions, a task-level breakdown and a best case and a worst case. A fixed-bid deal only makes sense when the specification is complete; otherwise the vendor pads the number and you fund the buffer regardless. Time and materials puts the risk on your side, so it demands a sprint cadence, demos and a budget cap.

Process beats the number of developers. Ask how a new requirement enters the plan, who writes the acceptance criteria and how quality assurance works. A mature dedicated team model can walk you through a live build at the end of each sprint. Clear, written acceptance criteria stay your only real protection against endless rounds of rework.

Finally, consider the day you no longer need this vendor while the relationship is still good. Ask that the source repository sits under your account from day one, and that documentation is updated as part of the work. A partner who is comfortable with this says yes immediately; hesitation here says most of what you need to know.